Eurasian Journal of Law, Finance and Applied Sciences 6-jild 5-son (2026) · 171–175-betlar

IMPROVING PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS FOR CHECKING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE BY THE INVESTIGATIVE JUDGE AT THE PRE-TRIAL STAGE

Ahmadjonov, Sultonbek

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20508450 · Manbada o'qish → · PDF (manba serverida)

Annotatsiya

The thesis analyzes the role of the newly introduced institution of the investigative judge in verifying the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings. The author identifies the lack of a mechanism for “filtering” illegally obtained evidence at the pre-trial stage as a primary issue. Based on the experiences of France and Italy, and the views of international scholars (M. Damaška, M. Delmas-Marty), it is proposed to grant the investigative judge the authority to declare evidence inadmissible by amending Articles 95-1 and 405-11 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Investigative judge, admissibility of evidence, inadmissible evidence, judicial control, Criminal Procedure Code, French experience, torture, procedural filter.Следственный судья, допустимость доказательств, недопустимые доказательства, судебный контроль, Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс, опыт Франции, пытки, процессуальный фильтр.Tergov sudyasi, dalillar maqbulligi, nomaqbul dalillar, sud nazorati, Jinoiy-protsessual kodeks, Fransiya tajribasi, qiynoqlar, protsessual filtr.

Metadata manbasi: jurnal OAI-PMH arxivi · Sindex to'liq matnni saqlamaydi, manbaga havola beradi.